Nebular emission and choice of IMF, stellar library

Hi. I was reading through the arXiv paper by @nell-byler about implementing nebular continuum and emission into python-fsps and had a question. If I understand correctly, the user can switch on nebular continuum and emission for both the Padova+Geneva isochrones and the MIST isochrones and have the nebular effects be implemented self-consistently for both. However, for other choices (e.g., IMF and stellar libraries) is it true that the nebular effects are only self-consistent for the selection of the Kroupa (2001) IMF and the BaSeL 3.1 spectral library and that changing these will result in inconsistent results?
For example, if I need the higher wavelength resolution of the MILES library and want to include nebular effects, do I need to worry that my nebular fluxes are not really correct? Thanks.

この issue では、等時線、IMF、恒星ライブラリの選択全体で星雲連続光と星雲放射が自己無撞着になっていないかを問うていますが、対象となるソースファイルやテストは示されていません。まず、参照されている arXiv 論文と、星雲設定に関する python-fsps のドキュメントを確認してください。どの組み合わせが自己無撞着であるか、また MILES ユーザーが星雲フラックスをどのように解釈すべきかを文書化できれば完了です。