Nebular emission and choice of IMF, stellar library

Hi. I was reading through the arXiv paper by @nell-byler about implementing nebular continuum and emission into python-fsps and had a question. If I understand correctly, the user can switch on nebular continuum and emission for both the Padova+Geneva isochrones and the MIST isochrones and have the nebular effects be implemented self-consistently for both. However, for other choices (e.g., IMF and stellar libraries) is it true that the nebular effects are only self-consistent for the selection of the Kroupa (2001) IMF and the BaSeL 3.1 spectral library and that changing these will result in inconsistent results?
For example, if I need the higher wavelength resolution of the MILES library and want to include nebular effects, do I need to worry that my nebular fluxes are not really correct? Thanks.

La issue chiede se il continuo nebularе e l’emissione nebularе rimangano autoconsistenti tra le scelte di isocrona, IMF e libreria stellare, ma non indica alcun file sorgente né alcun test. Inizia esaminando l’articolo arXiv citato e la documentazione di python-fsps sulle impostazioni nebulari. Il lavoro sarà completato quando saranno documentate le combinazioni autoconsistenti e il modo in cui gli utenti di MILES dovrebbero interpretare i flussi nebulari.