Nebular emission and choice of IMF, stellar library

Hi. I was reading through the arXiv paper by @nell-byler about implementing nebular continuum and emission into python-fsps and had a question. If I understand correctly, the user can switch on nebular continuum and emission for both the Padova+Geneva isochrones and the MIST isochrones and have the nebular effects be implemented self-consistently for both. However, for other choices (e.g., IMF and stellar libraries) is it true that the nebular effects are only self-consistent for the selection of the Kroupa (2001) IMF and the BaSeL 3.1 spectral library and that changing these will result in inconsistent results?
For example, if I need the higher wavelength resolution of the MILES library and want to include nebular effects, do I need to worry that my nebular fluxes are not really correct? Thanks.

L’issue demande si le continuum nébulaire et l’émission nébulaire restent cohérents entre eux selon les choix d’isochrone, d’IMF et de bibliothèque stellaire, mais ne mentionne aucun fichier source ni aucun test. Commencez par examiner l’article arXiv référencé et la documentation de python-fsps concernant les paramètres nébulaires. La tâche sera terminée lorsque seront documentées les combinaisons cohérentes entre elles et la manière dont les utilisateurs de MILES doivent interpréter les flux nébulaires.