Nebular emission and choice of IMF, stellar library

Hi. I was reading through the arXiv paper by @nell-byler about implementing nebular continuum and emission into python-fsps and had a question. If I understand correctly, the user can switch on nebular continuum and emission for both the Padova+Geneva isochrones and the MIST isochrones and have the nebular effects be implemented self-consistently for both. However, for other choices (e.g., IMF and stellar libraries) is it true that the nebular effects are only self-consistent for the selection of the Kroupa (2001) IMF and the BaSeL 3.1 spectral library and that changing these will result in inconsistent results?
For example, if I need the higher wavelength resolution of the MILES library and want to include nebular effects, do I need to worry that my nebular fluxes are not really correct? Thanks.

Die Issue fragt, ob Nebelkontinuum und Nebelemission über die Auswahl von Isochrone, IMF und Sternbibliothek hinweg selbstkonsistent bleiben, nennt jedoch keine Quelldatei oder keinen Test. Beginne mit der Durchsicht des referenzierten arXiv-Papers und der Dokumentation von python-fsps zu den Einstellungen für Nebelgas. Erledigt ist die Aufgabe, wenn dokumentiert ist, welche Kombinationen selbstkonsistent sind und wie MILES-Nutzer Nebelflüsse interpretieren sollten.