Nebular emission and choice of IMF, stellar library

Hi. I was reading through the arXiv paper by @nell-byler about implementing nebular continuum and emission into python-fsps and had a question. If I understand correctly, the user can switch on nebular continuum and emission for both the Padova+Geneva isochrones and the MIST isochrones and have the nebular effects be implemented self-consistently for both. However, for other choices (e.g., IMF and stellar libraries) is it true that the nebular effects are only self-consistent for the selection of the Kroupa (2001) IMF and the BaSeL 3.1 spectral library and that changing these will result in inconsistent results?
For example, if I need the higher wavelength resolution of the MILES library and want to include nebular effects, do I need to worry that my nebular fluxes are not really correct? Thanks.

该 issue 询问在等时线、IMF 和恒星库的不同选择之间，星云连续谱和星云发射是否保持自洽，但没有指明源文件或测试。首先查看所引用的 arXiv 论文以及 python-fsps 关于星云设置的文档。完成的标准是记录哪些组合是自洽的，以及 MILES 用户应如何解释星云通量。