Nebular emission and choice of IMF, stellar library

Hi. I was reading through the arXiv paper by @nell-byler about implementing nebular continuum and emission into python-fsps and had a question. If I understand correctly, the user can switch on nebular continuum and emission for both the Padova+Geneva isochrones and the MIST isochrones and have the nebular effects be implemented self-consistently for both. However, for other choices (e.g., IMF and stellar libraries) is it true that the nebular effects are only self-consistent for the selection of the Kroupa (2001) IMF and the BaSeL 3.1 spectral library and that changing these will result in inconsistent results?
For example, if I need the higher wavelength resolution of the MILES library and want to include nebular effects, do I need to worry that my nebular fluxes are not really correct? Thanks.

El issue plantea si el continuo nebular y la emisión nebular siguen siendo autoconsistentes entre las distintas opciones de isocronas, IMF y biblioteca estelar, pero no indica ningún archivo fuente ni prueba. Empieza revisando el artículo de arXiv referenciado y la documentación de python-fsps sobre la configuración nebular. Se considerará terminado cuando se documenten qué combinaciones son autoconsistentes y cómo deben interpretar los usuarios de MILES los flujos nebulares.