Shared Filesystems can't be deployed on local-only storage due to "HA" requirement
- 主要語言
- Java
- 星號
- 3.1k
- 分支
- 1.4k
- 平均合併
- 6 天 19 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 32
描述
### problem
The Shared Filesystem appliance requires a "HA enabled" compute offering - and it's not a bad idea, but in cloud with local storage only this becomes a problem as it's pointless to add HA=true to an offering on local storage and could also lead to other possible issues in Cloudstack internally (who knows..).
Is it worth adding a global option, such as "sharedfs.ha.required" and set it to yes/no depending on what storage you are running?
### versions
4.20 KVM
### The steps to reproduce the bug
Deploy Filesystem Share without HA enabled compute offering.
### What to do about it?
Discuss and maybe implement an extra global option to require or not HA in offerings.
貢獻指南
研究方向
從 Shared Filesystem appliance 的部署路徑以及要求啟用 HA 的計算 offering 的驗證開始。使用僅本機儲存和不含 HA 的 offering 重現部署,然後追蹤該要求如何套用。完成的標準是:可以針對本機儲存設定此行為,同時在需要的地方保留目前的 HA 要求。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 領域
- cloud, infrastructure
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 難度
- 4/5
- 預估耗時
- 3-5 天
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100