apache / apache/cloudstack

Shared Filesystems can't be deployed on local-only storage due to "HA" requirement

未关闭
#10,309 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
type:improvement
主要语言
Java
星标
3.1k
派生
1.4k
平均合并
6 天 19 小时
30 天内合并 PR
32

描述

### problem

The Shared Filesystem appliance requires a "HA enabled" compute offering - and it's not a bad idea, but in cloud with local storage only this becomes a problem as it's pointless to add HA=true to an offering on local storage and could also lead to other possible issues in Cloudstack internally (who knows..).

Is it worth adding a global option, such as "sharedfs.ha.required" and set it to yes/no depending on what storage you are running?

### versions

4.20 KVM

### The steps to reproduce the bug

Deploy Filesystem Share without HA enabled compute offering.

### What to do about it?

Discuss and maybe implement an extra global option to require or not HA in offerings.

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

调研方向

从 Shared Filesystem appliance 的部署路径以及要求启用 HA 的计算 offering 的验证开始。使用仅本地存储和不带 HA 的 offering 重现部署,然后追踪该要求是如何应用的。完成的标准是:可以针对本地存储配置该行为,同时在需要的地方保留当前的 HA 要求。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

领域
cloud, infrastructure
Issue 类型
缺陷
难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
35/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。