Shared Filesystems can't be deployed on local-only storage due to "HA" requirement
- 主要语言
- Java
- 星标
- 3.1k
- 派生
- 1.4k
- 平均合并
- 6 天 19 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 32
描述
### problem
The Shared Filesystem appliance requires a "HA enabled" compute offering - and it's not a bad idea, but in cloud with local storage only this becomes a problem as it's pointless to add HA=true to an offering on local storage and could also lead to other possible issues in Cloudstack internally (who knows..).
Is it worth adding a global option, such as "sharedfs.ha.required" and set it to yes/no depending on what storage you are running?
### versions
4.20 KVM
### The steps to reproduce the bug
Deploy Filesystem Share without HA enabled compute offering.
### What to do about it?
Discuss and maybe implement an extra global option to require or not HA in offerings.
贡献指南
调研方向
从 Shared Filesystem appliance 的部署路径以及要求启用 HA 的计算 offering 的验证开始。使用仅本地存储和不带 HA 的 offering 重现部署,然后追踪该要求是如何应用的。完成的标准是:可以针对本地存储配置该行为,同时在需要的地方保留当前的 HA 要求。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 领域
- cloud, infrastructure
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100