Might mock.MagicMock be given a type parameter?
未关闭
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
type-feature
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 36k
- PR 合并指标
- PR 指标待抓取
描述
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
In the case of
class MyClass:
def method_that_exists_on_my_class(self):
pass
my_mock_thing = mock.create_autospec(MyClass)
my_mock_thing.method_that_exists_on_my_class()
my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class()
my_mock_thing.method_that_exists_on_my_class.assert_called_once()
my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class.assert_called_once()
it would be nice if the type of my_mock_thing were mock.MagicMock[MyClass] (instead of "raw" mock.MagicMock) so that type-checkers could alert me that my call to my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class is a flaw in my test.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
(I looked around among both open and closed issues and didn't see anything on this topic; apologies if I overlooked an already-ongoing discussion...)
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
该提案围绕 mock.MagicMock 和 mock.create_autospec 展开;首先定位这些入口点,并检查当前如何对 mock 进行类型标注。然后确定与 autospec 属性访问相关的测试。当类型检查器能够标记 autospecced mock 上不存在的方法,同时保留对有效方法的访问时,即视为完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- testing-qa
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 25/100