Might mock.MagicMock be given a type parameter?

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

In the case of

class MyClass:
  def method_that_exists_on_my_class(self):
    pass

my_mock_thing = mock.create_autospec(MyClass)
my_mock_thing.method_that_exists_on_my_class()
my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class()
my_mock_thing.method_that_exists_on_my_class.assert_called_once()
my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class.assert_called_once()

it would be nice if the type of my_mock_thing were mock.MagicMock[MyClass] (instead of "raw" mock.MagicMock) so that type-checkers could alert me that my call to my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class is a flaw in my test.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

(I looked around among both open and closed issues and didn't see anything on this topic; apologies if I overlooked an already-ongoing discussion...)

La proposition se concentre sur mock.MagicMock et mock.create_autospec ; commencez par localiser ces points d’entrée et examiner comment les mocks sont actuellement typés. Identifiez ensuite les tests pertinents pour l’accès aux attributs d’autospec. Le travail est considéré comme terminé lorsque les vérificateurs de types peuvent signaler les méthodes inexistantes sur un mock autospeccé tout en préservant l’accès aux méthodes valides.