Might mock.MagicMock be given a type parameter?

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

In the case of

class MyClass:
  def method_that_exists_on_my_class(self):
    pass

my_mock_thing = mock.create_autospec(MyClass)
my_mock_thing.method_that_exists_on_my_class()
my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class()
my_mock_thing.method_that_exists_on_my_class.assert_called_once()
my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class.assert_called_once()

it would be nice if the type of my_mock_thing were mock.MagicMock[MyClass] (instead of "raw" mock.MagicMock) so that type-checkers could alert me that my call to my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class is a flaw in my test.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

(I looked around among both open and closed issues and didn't see anything on this topic; apologies if I overlooked an already-ongoing discussion...)

La proposta si concentra su mock.MagicMock e mock.create_autospec; inizia individuando questi punti di ingresso e verificando come vengono attualmente tipizzati i mock. Poi identifica i test rilevanti per l’accesso agli attributi di autospec. Il lavoro è completato quando i type checker possono segnalare metodi inesistenti su un mock autospecced, preservando al contempo l’accesso ai metodi validi.