Might mock.MagicMock be given a type parameter?

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

In the case of

class MyClass:
  def method_that_exists_on_my_class(self):
    pass

my_mock_thing = mock.create_autospec(MyClass)
my_mock_thing.method_that_exists_on_my_class()
my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class()
my_mock_thing.method_that_exists_on_my_class.assert_called_once()
my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class.assert_called_once()

it would be nice if the type of my_mock_thing were mock.MagicMock[MyClass] (instead of "raw" mock.MagicMock) so that type-checkers could alert me that my call to my_mock_thing.method_that_does_not_exist_on_my_class is a flaw in my test.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

(I looked around among both open and closed issues and didn't see anything on this topic; apologies if I overlooked an already-ongoing discussion...)

A proposta se concentra em mock.MagicMock e mock.create_autospec; comece localizando esses pontos de entrada e revisando como os mocks são tipados atualmente. Em seguida, identifique os testes relevantes para o acesso a atributos de autospec. O trabalho estará concluído quando os verificadores de tipos puderem sinalizar métodos inexistentes em um mock com autospec, preservando ao mesmo tempo o acesso a métodos válidos.