modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

New example: examples/servers/admission-gate — a real approve/deny ServerMiddleware demo

未關閉
#3,272 4 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

documentation P3 v2
主要語言
Python
星號
24.3k
分支
4k
平均合併
1 天 1 小時
30 天內合併 PR
31

描述

Summary

Propose adding a new example server, examples/servers/admission-gate, demonstrating a real approve/deny use of ServerMiddleware — the SDK has this real, documented pre-execution veto point (runner.py's own comment calls it a "middleware veto") but no existing example actually denies anything. The one middleware example (stories/middleware) is audit-logging only; the SDK's only human-in-the-loop pattern (stories/refund_desk) uses elicitation for mid-call parameter confirmation, a different mechanism from a pre-call approve/deny gate on the whole tool call.

What it is

A filesystem server (read_file/write_file/delete_file) whose write_file/delete_file calls go through a middleware that queries an admission model with a written policy and the proposed action, and raises MCPError (the same mechanism handler errors already use) instead of calling call_next when the model says the policy requires denial.

The model backend is real tulip-agents code (tulip.models.native.openai.OpenAIModel, whose base_url override is documented for vLLM endpoints) — a dependency of this one example only, declared in its own pyproject.toml, not the rest of the workspace. Demoed against Clusiana, a real (unreleased) checkpoint trained for this exact three-way decision; any tulip-compatible chat model works the same way.

Verified

Real MCP client, real stdio transport, the server run as its own installed console script, the gate backed by a live model over a real network call — 4/4 correct on a representative probe, with the denied writes/deletes independently confirmed to have genuinely not touched the filesystem (not the tool's own claimed result). Full methodology: gist.

Scope

Doesn't touch src/mcp at all — new example directory only, own pyproject.toml, matches the existing examples/servers/* pattern (each with independent dependencies, e.g. simple-auth adds pydantic-settings).

Have a working, tested implementation ready — opening this first per CONTRIBUTING.md before submitting the PR.

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

研究方向

從 CONTRIBUTING.md 和現有的 examples/servers/* 模式開始,尤其是 stories/middleware,接著檢查 runner.py 中關於 middleware veto 的註解。建立獨立的 examples/servers/admission-gate 目錄,並為其提供專屬的 pyproject.toml,驗證實際的 stdio 用戶端流程,包括遭拒的 write_file/delete_file 動作會引發 MCPError 且不會變更檔案系統。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

評估

技術堆疊
python
領域
backend
Issue 類型
功能
難度
3/5
預估耗時
1-2 天
活躍度
活躍
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
72/100

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。