modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
New example: examples/servers/admission-gate — a real approve/deny ServerMiddleware demo
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 24.3k
- Forks
- 4k
- Merge médio
- 1d 1h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 31
Descrição
Summary
Propose adding a new example server, examples/servers/admission-gate, demonstrating a real approve/deny use of ServerMiddleware — the SDK has this real, documented pre-execution veto point (runner.py's own comment calls it a "middleware veto") but no existing example actually denies anything. The one middleware example (stories/middleware) is audit-logging only; the SDK's only human-in-the-loop pattern (stories/refund_desk) uses elicitation for mid-call parameter confirmation, a different mechanism from a pre-call approve/deny gate on the whole tool call.
What it is
A filesystem server (read_file/write_file/delete_file) whose write_file/delete_file calls go through a middleware that queries an admission model with a written policy and the proposed action, and raises MCPError (the same mechanism handler errors already use) instead of calling call_next when the model says the policy requires denial.
The model backend is real tulip-agents code (tulip.models.native.openai.OpenAIModel, whose base_url override is documented for vLLM endpoints) — a dependency of this one example only, declared in its own pyproject.toml, not the rest of the workspace. Demoed against Clusiana, a real (unreleased) checkpoint trained for this exact three-way decision; any tulip-compatible chat model works the same way.
Verified
Real MCP client, real stdio transport, the server run as its own installed console script, the gate backed by a live model over a real network call — 4/4 correct on a representative probe, with the denied writes/deletes independently confirmed to have genuinely not touched the filesystem (not the tool's own claimed result). Full methodology: gist.
Scope
Doesn't touch src/mcp at all — new example directory only, own pyproject.toml, matches the existing examples/servers/* pattern (each with independent dependencies, e.g. simple-auth adds pydantic-settings).
Have a working, tested implementation ready — opening this first per CONTRIBUTING.md before submitting the PR.
Guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Direção de pesquisa
Comece por CONTRIBUTING.md e pelo padrão existente de examples/servers/*, especialmente stories/middleware; em seguida, inspecione o comentário de veto do middleware em runner.py. Crie o diretório isolado examples/servers/admission-gate com seu próprio pyproject.toml e verifique o fluxo real do cliente stdio, incluindo que ações write_file/delete_file negadas levantem MCPError e não alterem o sistema de arquivos.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Avaliação
- Stack de tecnologia
- python
- Domínio
- backend
- Tipo de issue
- Funcionalidade
- Dificuldade
- 3/5
- Tempo estimado
- 1-2 dias
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 72/100