modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

New example: examples/servers/admission-gate — a real approve/deny ServerMiddleware demo

Aperta
#3,272 4 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

documentation P3 v2
Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
24.3k
Fork
4k
Merge medio
1g 1h
PR unite (30g)
31

Descrizione

Summary

Propose adding a new example server, examples/servers/admission-gate, demonstrating a real approve/deny use of ServerMiddleware — the SDK has this real, documented pre-execution veto point (runner.py's own comment calls it a "middleware veto") but no existing example actually denies anything. The one middleware example (stories/middleware) is audit-logging only; the SDK's only human-in-the-loop pattern (stories/refund_desk) uses elicitation for mid-call parameter confirmation, a different mechanism from a pre-call approve/deny gate on the whole tool call.

What it is

A filesystem server (read_file/write_file/delete_file) whose write_file/delete_file calls go through a middleware that queries an admission model with a written policy and the proposed action, and raises MCPError (the same mechanism handler errors already use) instead of calling call_next when the model says the policy requires denial.

The model backend is real tulip-agents code (tulip.models.native.openai.OpenAIModel, whose base_url override is documented for vLLM endpoints) — a dependency of this one example only, declared in its own pyproject.toml, not the rest of the workspace. Demoed against Clusiana, a real (unreleased) checkpoint trained for this exact three-way decision; any tulip-compatible chat model works the same way.

Verified

Real MCP client, real stdio transport, the server run as its own installed console script, the gate backed by a live model over a real network call — 4/4 correct on a representative probe, with the denied writes/deletes independently confirmed to have genuinely not touched the filesystem (not the tool's own claimed result). Full methodology: gist.

Scope

Doesn't touch src/mcp at all — new example directory only, own pyproject.toml, matches the existing examples/servers/* pattern (each with independent dependencies, e.g. simple-auth adds pydantic-settings).

Have a working, tested implementation ready — opening this first per CONTRIBUTING.md before submitting the PR.

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia da CONTRIBUTING.md e dal pattern esistente examples/servers/*, in particolare stories/middleware, quindi esamina il commento sul veto del middleware in runner.py. Crea la directory isolata examples/servers/admission-gate con il proprio pyproject.toml e verifica il flusso reale del client stdio, incluso il fatto che le azioni write_file/delete_file negate sollevino MCPError e non modifichino il filesystem.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
python
Ambito
backend
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Difficoltà
3/5
Tempo stimato
1-2 giorni
Stato di attività
Attiva
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Idoneità per principianti
72/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.