modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

New example: examples/servers/admission-gate — a real approve/deny ServerMiddleware demo

Offen
#3,272 4 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

documentation P3 v2
Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
24.3k
Forks
4k
Ø Merge
1 T. 1 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
31

Beschreibung

Summary

Propose adding a new example server, examples/servers/admission-gate, demonstrating a real approve/deny use of ServerMiddleware — the SDK has this real, documented pre-execution veto point (runner.py's own comment calls it a "middleware veto") but no existing example actually denies anything. The one middleware example (stories/middleware) is audit-logging only; the SDK's only human-in-the-loop pattern (stories/refund_desk) uses elicitation for mid-call parameter confirmation, a different mechanism from a pre-call approve/deny gate on the whole tool call.

What it is

A filesystem server (read_file/write_file/delete_file) whose write_file/delete_file calls go through a middleware that queries an admission model with a written policy and the proposed action, and raises MCPError (the same mechanism handler errors already use) instead of calling call_next when the model says the policy requires denial.

The model backend is real tulip-agents code (tulip.models.native.openai.OpenAIModel, whose base_url override is documented for vLLM endpoints) — a dependency of this one example only, declared in its own pyproject.toml, not the rest of the workspace. Demoed against Clusiana, a real (unreleased) checkpoint trained for this exact three-way decision; any tulip-compatible chat model works the same way.

Verified

Real MCP client, real stdio transport, the server run as its own installed console script, the gate backed by a live model over a real network call — 4/4 correct on a representative probe, with the denied writes/deletes independently confirmed to have genuinely not touched the filesystem (not the tool's own claimed result). Full methodology: gist.

Scope

Doesn't touch src/mcp at all — new example directory only, own pyproject.toml, matches the existing examples/servers/* pattern (each with independent dependencies, e.g. simple-auth adds pydantic-settings).

Have a working, tested implementation ready — opening this first per CONTRIBUTING.md before submitting the PR.

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
  4. Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Rechercherichtung

Beginne mit CONTRIBUTING.md und dem bestehenden examples/servers/*-Muster, insbesondere stories/middleware, und untersuche anschließend den Middleware-Veto-Kommentar in runner.py. Erstelle das isolierte Verzeichnis examples/servers/admission-gate mit einer eigenen pyproject.toml und verifiziere den tatsächlichen stdio-Client-Flow, einschließlich dessen, dass verweigerte write_file/delete_file-Aktionen MCPError auslösen und das Dateisystem nicht verändern.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Bewertung

Tech-Stack
python
Bereich
backend
Issue-Typ
Feature
Schwierigkeit
3/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
1-2 Tage
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
72/100

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.