modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
Client-side support for the tasks extension (io.modelcontextprotocol/tasks, SEP-2663)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 24.3k
- Forks
- 4k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 1 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 31
Descripción
v2 removed the experimental tasks API in favor of the SEP-2663 extension (io.modelcontextprotocol/tasks), but the SDK currently ships no client-side way to consume task-augmented servers: a tools/call that returns resultType: "task" fails result validation unless every consumer hand-writes a ResultClaim.
The extension surface (ClientExtension.claims()) supports this cleanly. I have a working implementation (~120 lines + tests, exercised against a spec-conformant 2026-07-28 server with server-directed task creation) that:
- advertises
io.modelcontextprotocol/tasksin per-request capabilities, - claims
resultType: "task"ontools/call, - resolves the claim by polling
tasks/get(honoringpollIntervalMs, including mid-task changes), - maps
failed→ a raised error carrying the server's JSON-RPC error, andcancelled→ a distinct error, - sends best-effort
tasks/cancelwhen the caller's scope is cancelled (shielded), per the spec's cooperative-cancellation model, - sets
Mcp-Nameto the taskId ontasks/*requests vianame_param(the SEP-2663 routing-header requirement — theRequest.name_paramdocstring in mcp-types already anticipates this).
Happy to send a PR — proposed location mcp/client/extensions/tasks.py. Two design questions I'd like a maintainer opinion on before polishing:
- Should
input_requiredtasks surface through the existing elicitation callback plumbing (withtasks/updateas the response channel), or is that a follow-up? - Is transparent-polling-inside-
call_toolthe right default, or should the extension also expose the raw task handle for callers that want to manage polling themselves (e.g. UI progress)?
One porting note: the natural base for the wire models is MCPModel (camelCase alias generator), which mcp_types doesn't currently re-export — part of the value of upstreaming is resolving that properly.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con la API existente ClientExtension.claims() y la documentación de Request.name_param; después, revisa la ubicación propuesta mcp/client/extensions/tasks.py y las pruebas relacionadas. Implementa la compatibilidad del cliente con los resultados de tareas de tools/call, el sondeo de tasks/get con cancelación mediante tasks/cancel y los encabezados de enrutamiento de tareas; confirma el comportamiento según los estados de tarea descritos y un servidor conforme con la especificación.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- api, backend-api-design
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 52/100