Devendor cyclonedds + iceoryx

Reminder that now cyclonedds is up to date in conda-forge cyclonedds-feedstock. The only difference is that the cyclonedds in conda-forge is not compiled against iceoryx, as it's done currently on robostack ros-rolling-cyclonedds.

In theory, I should just add iceoryx as a dep of cyclonedds and enable a compiler flag; my only question here is regarding the conda-forge philosophy. Should we build two versions of cyclonedds with and w/o the extra dep? As in knowledge_base/#multi-output-recipes, or considering it does not hurt performance, just add it as a dep?

まず conda-forge の multi-output recipes guidance を読み、次に cyclonedds-feedstock パッケージと RoboStack の ros-rolling-cyclonedds ビルドを比較します。iceoryx 依存関係とコンパイラフラグを共有すべきか、outputs に分割すべきかを判断します。パッケージングのアプローチについて合意し、issue の質問が解決されれば完了です。