Inheriting from a generic class, which uses an annotated table definition causes fields to get lost

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

### How are you using the lua-language-server?

NeoVim

### Which OS are you using?

Windows

### What is the issue affecting?

Annotations, Type Checking

### Expected Behaviour

```lua
--- (field) Specific.value: string
hover(t.value)
```

### Actual Behaviour

```lua
--- (field) Specific.value: unknown
hover(t.value)
```

### Reproduction steps

```lua
---@class GenericSuper : { value: T }

---@class Specific : GenericSuper

---@type Specific
local t

hover(t.value)
```
Then hover on `t.value`

### Additional Notes

Interestingly this seems to only affect inheriting from table constructor. When converting it into a field, it works as expected:
```lua
---@class GenericSuper
---@field value T

---@class Specific : GenericSuper

---@type Specific
local t

--- (field) Specific.value: string
hover(t.value)
```

### Log File

_No response_

在 NeoVim 中使用報告中所示的表格建構子 GenericSuper 和繼承 Specific : GenericSuper 重現此問題。比較表格建構子形式和等效的 @field 形式的懸停結果；當在繼承的表格建構子情況下將 t.value 推斷為 string 時，即表示完成。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。