Inheriting from a generic class, which uses an annotated table definition causes fields to get lost

How are you using the lua-language-server?

NeoVim

Which OS are you using?

Windows

What is the issue affecting?

Annotations, Type Checking

Expected Behaviour

--- (field) Specific.value: string
hover(t.value)

Actual Behaviour

--- (field) Specific.value: unknown
hover(t.value)

Reproduction steps

---@class GenericSuper<T> : { value: T }

---@class Specific : GenericSuper<string>

---@type Specific
local t

hover(t.value)

Then hover on t.value

Additional Notes

Interestingly this seems to only affect inheriting from table constructor. When converting it into a field, it works as expected:

---@class GenericSuper<T>
---@field value T

---@class Specific : GenericSuper<string>

---@type Specific
local t

--- (field) Specific.value: string
hover(t.value)

Log File

No response

Riprodurre il problema in NeoVim usando il costruttore di tabelle GenericSuper e l’ereditarietà Specific : GenericSuper mostrati nel report. Confrontare i risultati dell’hover per la forma del costruttore di tabelle e la forma equivalente @field; il lavoro è completato quando t.value viene inferito come string nel caso del costruttore di tabelle ereditato.