Naming consistency for various types

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

A number of classes self-report names which are not an importable name for that type.
The inconsistency means that the class itself can’t be pickled, typeshed can’t match their display name, and can cause minor confusion. I’m interested in getting these to be consistent where possible.

An accounting of all the types I know about in the category is available at the linked discuss thread.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

I have already discussed this feature proposal on Discourse

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

Recent discuss thread: https://discuss.python.org/t/naming-consistency-for-various-types/70401

Another related discussion for types exposed in the types module is available here: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/100129

Linked PRs

• gh-126663
• gh-126712
• gh-126721
• gh-126723
• gh-126724
• gh-137122
• gh-137123

まず、リンクされたDiscourseの議論と関連するissue 100129を読み、その後PRs 126663、126712、126721、126723、126724、137122、137123を確認します。そこで示されている影響を受ける型の一覧を使って合意された範囲を判断します。選定された型が一貫してimport可能な名前を報告し、記載されているpicklingとtypeshedに関する懸念に対処できれば、作業は完了です。