Naming consistency for various types

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

A number of classes self-report names which are not an importable name for that type.
The inconsistency means that the class itself can’t be pickled, typeshed can’t match their display name, and can cause minor confusion. I’m interested in getting these to be consistent where possible.

An accounting of all the types I know about in the category is available at the linked discuss thread.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

I have already discussed this feature proposal on Discourse

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

Recent discuss thread: https://discuss.python.org/t/naming-consistency-for-various-types/70401

Another related discussion for types exposed in the types module is available here: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/100129

Linked PRs

• gh-126663
• gh-126712
• gh-126721
• gh-126723
• gh-126724
• gh-137122
• gh-137123

先阅读链接的 Discourse 讨论和相关 issue 100129，然后查看 PRs 126663、126712、126721、126723、126724、137122 和 137123。使用其中对受影响类型的列举来确定已达成共识的范围；当选定类型都能一致地报告可 import 的名称，并且所述的 pickling 和 typeshed 问题都得到处理时，工作即完成。