Naming consistency for various types

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

A number of classes self-report names which are not an importable name for that type.
The inconsistency means that the class itself can’t be pickled, typeshed can’t match their display name, and can cause minor confusion. I’m interested in getting these to be consistent where possible.

An accounting of all the types I know about in the category is available at the linked discuss thread.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

I have already discussed this feature proposal on Discourse

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

Recent discuss thread: https://discuss.python.org/t/naming-consistency-for-various-types/70401

Another related discussion for types exposed in the types module is available here: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/100129

Linked PRs

• gh-126663
• gh-126712
• gh-126721
• gh-126723
• gh-126724
• gh-137122
• gh-137123

先閱讀連結的 Discourse 討論和相關 issue 100129，然後查看 PRs 126663、126712、126721、126723、126724、137122 和 137123。使用其中對受影響型別的列舉來確定已達成共識的範圍；當選定型別都能一致地回報可 import 的名稱，並且所述的 pickling 和 typeshed 問題都得到處理時，工作即完成。