nodejs / nodejs/node

async_hooks: AsyncLocalStorage losing context

Abierto
#41,285 19 comentarios 19 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

async_hooks async_local_storage
Lenguaje dominante
JavaScript
Estrellas
122k
Forks
37.3k
Merge medio
4 d 2 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
283

Descripción

Version

node v17.3.0 / 16.13.0

Platform

linux (likely all)

Subsystem

async_hooks

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Run

'use strict'

const { AsyncLocalStorage } = require('async_hooks')
const { createServer } = require('http')

const storage = new AsyncLocalStorage()

let counter = 0
createServer((req, res) => {
  const id = counter++;
  console.log('In Middleware with id ' + id);
  storage.run({ id }, function () {
    req.resume()
    req.on('end', onEnd(res))
  });
}).listen(3000)

function onEnd (res) {
  return () => {
    const store = storage.getStore()
    console.log('store is', store)
    res.end(JSON.stringify(store))
  }
}

Then:

curl -d '{}' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' localhost:3000

You'd note that the store is empty.

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

All of them. Unfortunately the documentation is quite misleading and it assumes the above would work / we do not document the edge cases.

The problem originates on the fact that receiving an HTTP body is part of the http request AsyncRecource. Calling .resume() on it does not imply we are attaching the new storage to that AsyncResource. However our documentation states:

Runs a function synchronously within a context and returns its return value. The store is not accessible outside of the callback function. The store is accessible to any asynchronous operations created within the callback.

Unless somebody knows that calling resume() is not creating a new asynchronous operation, they will be expecting the context to be preserved.

As a further confirmation, the following code works:

'use strict'

const { AsyncLocalStorage } = require('async_hooks')
const { createServer } = require('http')

const storage = new AsyncLocalStorage()

let counter = 0
createServer((req, res) => {
  const id = counter++;
  console.log('In Middleware with id ' + id);
  storage.enterWith({ id })
  req.resume()
  req.on('end', onEnd(res))
}).listen(3000)

function onEnd (res) {
  return () => {
    const store = storage.getStore()
    console.log('store is', store)
    res.end(JSON.stringify(store))
  }
}
What is the expected behavior?

We might decide this is a bug that should be fixed or we might decide to stabilize enterWith and document this case.

The problem is that the current documentation is misleading folks into thinking storage.run() is the right API in all cases but it is not as things are.

What do you see instead?

No response

Additional information

No response

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Línea de trabajo

Comienza con el comportamiento de AsyncLocalStorage de run/enterWith en la reproducción del servidor HTTP, centrándote en req.resume() y req.on('end', ...). Compara la propagación del contexto observada con la garantía documentada para operaciones asíncronas. Se considera terminado cuando el proyecto decide si debe cambiar la propagación o se documentan el caso límite y el comportamiento apropiado de la API.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
javascript, node.js
Área
backend
Tipo de issue
Error
Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Estado de actividad
Tranquilo
Claridad
Bastante claro
Aptitud para principiantes
42/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.