Data.table being sidelined by Rstudio?

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Thanks for the great write up, it surely provided some food for thought.

I have a question though:Under language unity you write:

"For instance, consider the lightning-fast data.table package. Rather than welcoming it as a hugely valuable contribution to R, RStudio has treated it as a competitor, downplaying it and promoting their own product, dplyr. This is simply not healthy for an open-source language."

I wonder if you could give examples or elaborate on that. I've actually seen some evidence to the contrary in the [dtplyr](https://github.com/hadley/dtplyr) package which is actively being developed by Hadley Wickham and is designed to integrate both packages.

Inizia con il passaggio citato “Under language unity” nell’articolo e analizza la domanda dell’issue su RStudio, data.table, dplyr e dtplyr. Per considerare il lavoro completato sarebbe necessario decidere quali esempi specifici o approfondimenti aggiungere, ma l’issue non identifica un file dell’articolo né una modifica dei contenuti definita.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.