Data.table being sidelined by Rstudio?

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Thanks for the great write up, it surely provided some food for thought.

I have a question though:Under language unity you write:

"For instance, consider the lightning-fast data.table package. Rather than welcoming it as a hugely valuable contribution to R, RStudio has treated it as a competitor, downplaying it and promoting their own product, dplyr. This is simply not healthy for an open-source language."

I wonder if you could give examples or elaborate on that. I've actually seen some evidence to the contrary in the [dtplyr](https://github.com/hadley/dtplyr) package which is actively being developed by Hadley Wickham and is designed to integrate both packages.

Commencez par le passage cité « Under language unity » dans l’article et examinez la question de l’issue concernant RStudio, data.table, dplyr et dtplyr. Pour considérer le travail comme terminé, il faudrait décider quels exemples précis ou quels développements ajouter, mais l’issue n’identifie ni fichier de l’article ni modification de contenu définie.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.