Data.table being sidelined by Rstudio?

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Thanks for the great write up, it surely provided some food for thought.

I have a question though:Under language unity you write:

"For instance, consider the lightning-fast data.table package. Rather than welcoming it as a hugely valuable contribution to R, RStudio has treated it as a competitor, downplaying it and promoting their own product, dplyr. This is simply not healthy for an open-source language."

I wonder if you could give examples or elaborate on that. I've actually seen some evidence to the contrary in the [dtplyr](https://github.com/hadley/dtplyr) package which is actively being developed by Hadley Wickham and is designed to integrate both packages.

Comienza con el pasaje citado “Under language unity” del artículo y revisa la pregunta del issue sobre RStudio, data.table, dplyr y dtplyr. Para darlo por terminado habría que decidir qué ejemplos específicos o qué explicación adicional añadir, pero el issue no identifica ningún archivo del artículo ni un cambio de contenido definido.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.