Content drift: Mention security-and-quality as a default CodeQL query suite
- Linguagem predominante
- TypeScript
- Estrelas
- 20.8k
- Forks
- 68.7k
- Merge médio
- 13h 17min
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 110
Descrição
### Code of Conduct
- [x] I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/github/docs/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
### What article on docs.github.com is affected?
[CodeQL query suites](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/codeql/codeql-query-suites#built-in-codeql-query-suites)
### What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
[CodeQL query suites](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/codeql/codeql-query-suites#built-in-codeql-query-suites) lists only two built-in query suites while the [Workflow configuration options for code scanning](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/reference/code-scanning/workflow-configuration-options) page lists `security-and-quality` as another built-in suite. Please align the documentation. Thanks.
### Additional information
_No response_
Guia de contribuição
Direção de pesquisa
Start with the CodeQL query suites article, especially the built-in CodeQL query suites section, and compare it with the linked Workflow configuration options for code scanning page. Update the documentation so both pages consistently identify security-and-quality as a built-in suite, then verify the affected links and wording.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Avaliação
- Stack de tecnologia
- github
- Domínio
- documentation
- Tipo de issue
- Documentação
- Dificuldade
- 1/5
- Tempo estimado
- Menos de uma hora
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Clareza
- Claramente especificada
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 88/100