Content drift: Mention security-and-quality as a default CodeQL query suite
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 20.8k
- Forks
- 68.7k
- Merge medio
- 12 h 24 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 105
Descripción
### Code of Conduct
- [x] I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/github/docs/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
### What article on docs.github.com is affected?
[CodeQL query suites](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/codeql/codeql-query-suites#built-in-codeql-query-suites)
### What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
[CodeQL query suites](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/codeql/codeql-query-suites#built-in-codeql-query-suites) lists only two built-in query suites while the [Workflow configuration options for code scanning](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/reference/code-scanning/workflow-configuration-options) page lists `security-and-quality` as another built-in suite. Please align the documentation. Thanks.
### Additional information
_No response_
Guía de contribución
Línea de trabajo
Start with the CodeQL query suites article, especially the built-in CodeQL query suites section, and compare it with the linked Workflow configuration options for code scanning page. Update the documentation so both pages consistently identify security-and-quality as a built-in suite, then verify the affected links and wording.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- github
- Área
- documentation
- Tipo de issue
- Documentación
- Dificultad
- 1/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Menos de una hora
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 88/100