Content drift: Mention security-and-quality as a default CodeQL query suite
- Langage dominant
- TypeScript
- Étoiles
- 20.8k
- Forks
- 68.7k
- Merge moyen
- 12 h 24 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 105
Description
### Code of Conduct
- [x] I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/github/docs/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
### What article on docs.github.com is affected?
[CodeQL query suites](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/codeql/codeql-query-suites#built-in-codeql-query-suites)
### What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
[CodeQL query suites](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/codeql/codeql-query-suites#built-in-codeql-query-suites) lists only two built-in query suites while the [Workflow configuration options for code scanning](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/reference/code-scanning/workflow-configuration-options) page lists `security-and-quality` as another built-in suite. Please align the documentation. Thanks.
### Additional information
_No response_
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Piste de recherche
Start with the CodeQL query suites article, especially the built-in CodeQL query suites section, and compare it with the linked Workflow configuration options for code scanning page. Update the documentation so both pages consistently identify security-and-quality as a built-in suite, then verify the affected links and wording.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- github
- Domaine
- documentation
- Type d'issue
- Documentation
- Difficulté
- 1/5
- Temps estimé
- Moins d'une heure
- Activité
- Active
- Clarté
- Clairement spécifiée
- Accessibilité débutants
- 88/100