Content drift: Mention security-and-quality as a default CodeQL query suite
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- TypeScript
- Sterne
- 20.8k
- Forks
- 68.7k
- Ø Merge
- 12 Std. 24 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 105
Beschreibung
### Code of Conduct
- [x] I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/github/docs/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
### What article on docs.github.com is affected?
[CodeQL query suites](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/codeql/codeql-query-suites#built-in-codeql-query-suites)
### What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
[CodeQL query suites](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/codeql/codeql-query-suites#built-in-codeql-query-suites) lists only two built-in query suites while the [Workflow configuration options for code scanning](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/reference/code-scanning/workflow-configuration-options) page lists `security-and-quality` as another built-in suite. Please align the documentation. Thanks.
### Additional information
_No response_
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Start with the CodeQL query suites article, especially the built-in CodeQL query suites section, and compare it with the linked Workflow configuration options for code scanning page. Update the documentation so both pages consistently identify security-and-quality as a built-in suite, then verify the affected links and wording.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- github
- Bereich
- documentation
- Issue-Typ
- Dokumentation
- Schwierigkeit
- 1/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Unter einer Stunde
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 88/100