github / github/copilot-cli

System prompt still instructs the model to use grep, glob, view and lsp after --available-tools has removed them

オープン
#4,596 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

triage
主要言語
Shell
スター
11.2k
フォーク
1.9k
平均マージ
14時間 16分
マージ済み PR(30日)
6

説明

Version

1.0.80 — self-reported by the CLI inside the system prompt it sends (<version_information>Version number: 1.0.80</version_information>), so the version and the defect come from the same captured request.

What happens

When --available-tools narrows the tool set (in my case to a single MCP server's tools), the tool declaration is correctly narrowed — the request carries exactly the allowed tools and nothing else. But the system prompt is not narrowed with it. Three sections continue to instruct the model to use tools that are no longer available:

  • <tool_preferences>"Use the grep tool instead of commands like grep/rg in bash · Use the glob tool instead of commands like find/ls · Use the view tool instead of commands like cat/head/tail"
  • <code_search_tools>"Prefer calling in the following order: Code Intelligence Tools (if available) > lsp (if available) > glob > grep with glob pattern"
  • <exploration_and_reading_files> — instructions on batching view calls

The model follows them, the calls are rejected at the tool boundary (Tool 'view' does not exist. Available tools that can be called are …), and the turn is spent.

Note this is not uniform behaviour across sections: dropping the skill tool does remove the <available_skills> block from the prompt. So some sections are already tool-conditional and these three appear not to be, which is what makes this look like an oversight rather than a design decision.

Reproduction
copilot -p "read the file ./notes.txt and summarise it" \
  --available-tools <one-mcp-server-tool> \
  --allow-tool <that-server> \
  --disable-builtin-mcps \
  --no-custom-instructions

Inspect the outgoing request (any HTTPS proxy will show it). The tools array contains only the allowed tool; the system content still contains the three sections above.

Impact

The model wastes turns on tools it cannot call, and each one is billed. In one of my sessions the model tried twice in a row:

turn 3   view  path=/tmp/copilot-tool-output-176a24.txt
         → Tool 'view' does not exist.
turn 5   bash  cat /tmp/copilot-tool-output-1789a0.txt
         → Tool 'bash' does not exist.

Both were the prompt's advice followed literally. Beyond the cost, it makes a restricted-tool session behave measurably differently from what the flag implies, which matters if you are using the CLI as a controlled harness.

What I checked for a workaround
  • Every flag in copilot --help on 1.0.80. --no-custom-instructions closes the custom-instructions channel and nothing else; --available-tools and --excluded-tools both affect availability, not the prompt.
  • Every variable in copilot help environment. None gates prompt assembly.
  • Hook surface: none documented.
Suggested fix

Make these three sections conditional on the corresponding tools actually being available, the way <available_skills> already is.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

調査の方向性

まず、提供されている copilot コマンドを --available-tools 付きで実行し、絞り込まれた tools 配列と system prompt を比較しながら送信リクエストを調査します。<available_skills> の既存の動作を参照しつつ、<tool_preferences>、<code_search_tools>、<exploration_and_reading_files> のプロンプト組み立てを追跡します。完了条件は、これらのセクションで利用できない tools が推奨されなくなることです。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
shell
領域
cli
issue の種類
バグ
難易度
3/5
見積もり時間
1〜2日
活発さ
活発
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
67/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。