System prompt still instructs the model to use grep, glob, view and lsp after --available-tools has removed them
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- Shell
- Stelle
- 11.2k
- Fork
- 1.9k
- Merge medio
- 14h 16m
- PR unite (30g)
- 6
Descrizione
Version
1.0.80 — self-reported by the CLI inside the system prompt it sends (<version_information>Version number: 1.0.80</version_information>), so the version and the defect come from the same captured request.
What happens
When --available-tools narrows the tool set (in my case to a single MCP server's tools), the tool declaration is correctly narrowed — the request carries exactly the allowed tools and nothing else. But the system prompt is not narrowed with it. Three sections continue to instruct the model to use tools that are no longer available:
<tool_preferences>— "Use the grep tool instead of commands likegrep/rgin bash · Use the glob tool instead of commands likefind/ls· Use the view tool instead of commands likecat/head/tail"<code_search_tools>— "Prefer calling in the following order: Code Intelligence Tools (if available) > lsp (if available) > glob > grep with glob pattern"<exploration_and_reading_files>— instructions on batchingviewcalls
The model follows them, the calls are rejected at the tool boundary (Tool 'view' does not exist. Available tools that can be called are …), and the turn is spent.
Note this is not uniform behaviour across sections: dropping the skill tool does remove the <available_skills> block from the prompt. So some sections are already tool-conditional and these three appear not to be, which is what makes this look like an oversight rather than a design decision.
Reproduction
copilot -p "read the file ./notes.txt and summarise it" \
--available-tools <one-mcp-server-tool> \
--allow-tool <that-server> \
--disable-builtin-mcps \
--no-custom-instructions
Inspect the outgoing request (any HTTPS proxy will show it). The tools array contains only the allowed tool; the system content still contains the three sections above.
Impact
The model wastes turns on tools it cannot call, and each one is billed. In one of my sessions the model tried twice in a row:
turn 3 view path=/tmp/copilot-tool-output-176a24.txt
→ Tool 'view' does not exist.
turn 5 bash cat /tmp/copilot-tool-output-1789a0.txt
→ Tool 'bash' does not exist.
Both were the prompt's advice followed literally. Beyond the cost, it makes a restricted-tool session behave measurably differently from what the flag implies, which matters if you are using the CLI as a controlled harness.
What I checked for a workaround
- Every flag in
copilot --helpon 1.0.80.--no-custom-instructionscloses the custom-instructions channel and nothing else;--available-toolsand--excluded-toolsboth affect availability, not the prompt. - Every variable in
copilot help environment. None gates prompt assembly. - Hook surface: none documented.
Suggested fix
Make these three sections conditional on the corresponding tools actually being available, the way <available_skills> already is.
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia eseguendo il comando copilot fornito con --available-tools e ispezionando la richiesta in uscita, confrontando l’array tools ristretto con il system prompt. Traccia l’assemblaggio del prompt per <tool_preferences>, <code_search_tools> e <exploration_and_reading_files>, usando come riferimento il comportamento esistente di <available_skills>; il lavoro è completato quando i tools non disponibili non vengono più consigliati in quelle sezioni.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- shell
- Ambito
- cli
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 67/100