System prompt still instructs the model to use grep, glob, view and lsp after --available-tools has removed them
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- Shell
- Étoiles
- 11.2k
- Forks
- 1.9k
- Merge moyen
- 14 h 16 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 6
Description
Version
1.0.80 — self-reported by the CLI inside the system prompt it sends (<version_information>Version number: 1.0.80</version_information>), so the version and the defect come from the same captured request.
What happens
When --available-tools narrows the tool set (in my case to a single MCP server's tools), the tool declaration is correctly narrowed — the request carries exactly the allowed tools and nothing else. But the system prompt is not narrowed with it. Three sections continue to instruct the model to use tools that are no longer available:
<tool_preferences>— "Use the grep tool instead of commands likegrep/rgin bash · Use the glob tool instead of commands likefind/ls· Use the view tool instead of commands likecat/head/tail"<code_search_tools>— "Prefer calling in the following order: Code Intelligence Tools (if available) > lsp (if available) > glob > grep with glob pattern"<exploration_and_reading_files>— instructions on batchingviewcalls
The model follows them, the calls are rejected at the tool boundary (Tool 'view' does not exist. Available tools that can be called are …), and the turn is spent.
Note this is not uniform behaviour across sections: dropping the skill tool does remove the <available_skills> block from the prompt. So some sections are already tool-conditional and these three appear not to be, which is what makes this look like an oversight rather than a design decision.
Reproduction
copilot -p "read the file ./notes.txt and summarise it" \
--available-tools <one-mcp-server-tool> \
--allow-tool <that-server> \
--disable-builtin-mcps \
--no-custom-instructions
Inspect the outgoing request (any HTTPS proxy will show it). The tools array contains only the allowed tool; the system content still contains the three sections above.
Impact
The model wastes turns on tools it cannot call, and each one is billed. In one of my sessions the model tried twice in a row:
turn 3 view path=/tmp/copilot-tool-output-176a24.txt
→ Tool 'view' does not exist.
turn 5 bash cat /tmp/copilot-tool-output-1789a0.txt
→ Tool 'bash' does not exist.
Both were the prompt's advice followed literally. Beyond the cost, it makes a restricted-tool session behave measurably differently from what the flag implies, which matters if you are using the CLI as a controlled harness.
What I checked for a workaround
- Every flag in
copilot --helpon 1.0.80.--no-custom-instructionscloses the custom-instructions channel and nothing else;--available-toolsand--excluded-toolsboth affect availability, not the prompt. - Every variable in
copilot help environment. None gates prompt assembly. - Hook surface: none documented.
Suggested fix
Make these three sections conditional on the corresponding tools actually being available, the way <available_skills> already is.
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez par exécuter la commande copilot fournie avec --available-tools et inspectez la requête sortante en comparant le tableau tools réduit avec le system prompt. Suivez l’assemblage du prompt pour <tool_preferences>, <code_search_tools> et <exploration_and_reading_files>, en vous servant du comportement existant de <available_skills> comme référence ; le travail est terminé lorsque les tools indisponibles ne sont plus recommandés dans ces sections.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- shell
- Domaine
- cli
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Difficulté
- 3/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-2 jours
- Activité
- Active
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 67/100