Confusing behavior of ssl.create_default_context()
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Métriques de PR en attente
Description
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/8563966be4f171ccf615105ef9d3a5aa65a1de68/Lib/ssl.py#L697-L703
Hello!
Got tripped up by this logic recently. It might merit clarification in the docs.
Here's what I read:
Security considerations
Best defaults
For client use, if you don’t have any special requirements for your security policy, it is highly recommended that you use the create_default_context() function to create your SSL context. It will load the system’s trusted CA certificates, enable certificate validation and hostname checking, and try to choose reasonably secure protocol and cipher settings.
Note that it suggests using create_default_context() without any arguments for client use. This is correct. It is also confusing, since the default value of purpose is Purpose.SERVER_AUTH. When I read on, this seems like the wrong option:
Changed in version 3.10: The context now uses PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENT or PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER protocol instead of generic PROTOCOL_TLS.
After reading this too quickly, I incorrectly assume:
- Whatever argument is passed to
create_default_context()used to not matter but does matter now. - Since I want to run
PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENTwith client auth, I had better passPurpose.CLIENT_AUTH.
In fact, CLIENT_AUTH sets PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER and SERVER_AUTH sets PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENT. This leads to the confusing error
>>> ssl.create_default_context(ssl.Purpose.CLIENT_AUTH).wrap_bio(ssl.MemoryBIO(), ssl.MemoryBIO())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../python3.10/ssl.py", line 527, in wrap_bio
return self.sslobject_class._create(
File ".../python3.10/ssl.py", line 866, in _create
sslobj = context._wrap_bio(
ssl.SSLError: Cannot create a client socket with a PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER context (_ssl.c:801)
Proposed resolution
I submit that it's fundamentally confusing to control protocol selection via an x509v3 extended key usage string. For instance, suppose that I anticipate two certificates with different purposes will be involved in my connection: a client certificate with CLIENT_AUTH and server certificate with SERVER_AUTH. How should I invoke ssl.create_default_context() if I am the client? If I am the server?
I submit that clearer arguments would be
- Will this context be used in a server? Default
server_side=False, in accordance with the current default value ofpurpose. - Will this context request and/or validate a certificate from the other party? Default
cert_reqs=CERT_REQUIRED, because skipping certificate validation generally defeats the purpose of TLS.
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Lisez la documentation de create_default_context() et la logique associée dans Lib/ssl.py autour des lignes 697-703, puis reproduisez le comportement de Purpose.CLIENT_AUTH et Purpose.SERVER_AUTH présenté dans l’issue. Clarifiez la correspondance entre les objectifs client et serveur, et expliquez le lien entre les certificats et la sélection du protocole, ou documentez l’alternative acceptée si l’API doit être modifiée.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- python
- Domaine
- security
- Type d'issue
- Documentation
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100