Confusing behavior of ssl.create_default_context()
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 77.2k
- Forks
- 36k
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- PR-Kennzahlen ausstehend
Beschreibung
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/8563966be4f171ccf615105ef9d3a5aa65a1de68/Lib/ssl.py#L697-L703
Hello!
Got tripped up by this logic recently. It might merit clarification in the docs.
Here's what I read:
Security considerations
Best defaults
For client use, if you don’t have any special requirements for your security policy, it is highly recommended that you use the create_default_context() function to create your SSL context. It will load the system’s trusted CA certificates, enable certificate validation and hostname checking, and try to choose reasonably secure protocol and cipher settings.
Note that it suggests using create_default_context() without any arguments for client use. This is correct. It is also confusing, since the default value of purpose is Purpose.SERVER_AUTH. When I read on, this seems like the wrong option:
Changed in version 3.10: The context now uses PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENT or PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER protocol instead of generic PROTOCOL_TLS.
After reading this too quickly, I incorrectly assume:
- Whatever argument is passed to
create_default_context()used to not matter but does matter now. - Since I want to run
PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENTwith client auth, I had better passPurpose.CLIENT_AUTH.
In fact, CLIENT_AUTH sets PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER and SERVER_AUTH sets PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENT. This leads to the confusing error
>>> ssl.create_default_context(ssl.Purpose.CLIENT_AUTH).wrap_bio(ssl.MemoryBIO(), ssl.MemoryBIO())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File ".../python3.10/ssl.py", line 527, in wrap_bio
return self.sslobject_class._create(
File ".../python3.10/ssl.py", line 866, in _create
sslobj = context._wrap_bio(
ssl.SSLError: Cannot create a client socket with a PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER context (_ssl.c:801)
Proposed resolution
I submit that it's fundamentally confusing to control protocol selection via an x509v3 extended key usage string. For instance, suppose that I anticipate two certificates with different purposes will be involved in my connection: a client certificate with CLIENT_AUTH and server certificate with SERVER_AUTH. How should I invoke ssl.create_default_context() if I am the client? If I am the server?
I submit that clearer arguments would be
- Will this context be used in a server? Default
server_side=False, in accordance with the current default value ofpurpose. - Will this context request and/or validate a certificate from the other party? Default
cert_reqs=CERT_REQUIRED, because skipping certificate validation generally defeats the purpose of TLS.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Lesen Sie die Dokumentation zu create_default_context() und die verknüpfte Logik in Lib/ssl.py um die Zeilen 697–703, und reproduzieren Sie das im Issue gezeigte Verhalten von Purpose.CLIENT_AUTH und Purpose.SERVER_AUTH. Klären Sie die Zuordnung der Client-/Server-Zwecke und erklären Sie, wie Zertifikate und die Protokollauswahl zusammenhängen, oder dokumentieren Sie die akzeptierte Alternative, falls die API geändert werden sollte.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- python
- Bereich
- security
- Issue-Typ
- Dokumentation
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100