Inconsistant behavior of .readable() and .writable() on io.IOBase
未关闭
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
extension-modules
topic-IO
type-bug
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 77.2k
- 派生
- 36k
- PR 合并指标
- PR 指标待抓取
描述
Bug report
The methods .readble() and .writable() on io.IOBase should return a boolean representing if the file can be read from/written to. However, calling .readable() on a closed IO file object causes a ValueError, whereas calling .writable() on a closed file returns False if the file was opened with just read permissions, but raises ValueError if it was opened with read and write permissions.
Make a folder with a text file in, then run:
f = open("hello.txt")
print(f.writable())
print(f.readable())
f.close()
print(f.writable())
print(f.readable())
This will output:
False
True
False
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
Then doing a similar thing, but with w+ permissions
f = open("hello.txt", "w+")
print(f.writable())
print(f.readable())
f.close()
print(f.writable())
print(f.readable())
Will output
True
True
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
Your environment
- CPython versions tested on: 3.10.4
- Operating system and architecture: Windows 64bit
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先复现 issue 中关于已关闭文件的两个示例,然后检查 io.IOBase.readable() 和 writable() 入口点及其相关测试。完成的标准是,这两个方法对已关闭文件具有一致且有文档记录的行为,同时保留对打开文件的预期结果。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- operating-systems
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 38/100