Inconsistant behavior of .readable() and .writable() on io.IOBase

Open
#96,780 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
38/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
python

Research direction

Start by reproducing the two closed-file examples in the issue, then inspect the io.IOBase.readable() and writable() entry points and their related tests. Done means the two methods have consistent, documented behavior for closed files while preserving the expected results for open files.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

extension-modules topic-IO type-bug

Bug report

The methods .readble() and .writable() on io.IOBase should return a boolean representing if the file can be read from/written to. However, calling .readable() on a closed IO file object causes a ValueError, whereas calling .writable() on a closed file returns False if the file was opened with just read permissions, but raises ValueError if it was opened with read and write permissions.

Make a folder with a text file in, then run:

f = open("hello.txt")
print(f.writable())
print(f.readable())
f.close()
print(f.writable())
print(f.readable())

This will output:

False
True
False
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: I/O operation on closed file

Then doing a similar thing, but with w+ permissions

f = open("hello.txt", "w+")
print(f.writable())
print(f.readable())
f.close()
print(f.writable())
print(f.readable())

Will output

True
True
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: I/O operation on closed file

Your environment

  • CPython versions tested on: 3.10.4
  • Operating system and architecture: Windows 64bit
Dominant language
Python
Stars
77.2k
Forks
36k
Avg merge
1d 9h
Merged PRs (30d)
558

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from python/cpython

All issues in python/cpython

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.