`warnings.deprecated` has no `skip_file_prefixes`

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

Seems like when adding warnings.deprecated in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/104004, it was forgotten to add one of the two stack skipping arguments.

It needs it for the same reasons why it already got stacklevel, e.g. because adding decorators adds stack levels in a hard to predict way (e.g. a 3rd party decorator might start calling the wrapped function one level deeper, suddenly changing where the warning points)

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

Yes, and it was accepted, but then apparently fogotten, see link below

cc @brettcannon @JelleZijlstra

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036/11

Linked PRs

• gh-156937

warnings.deprecated の実装とテストをレビューします。まず stacklevel の扱い方と、skip_file_prefixes が他の場所でどのように表現されているかを確認してください。リンク先の PR gh-156937 が、調査対象となる現在の作業です。完了条件は、記載されたデコレーターおよびスタックトレースのケースで、warnings.deprecated が skip_file_prefixes をサポートし、その挙動をカバーするテストがあることです。