Naming consistency for various types

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

A number of classes self-report names which are not an importable name for that type.
The inconsistency means that the class itself can’t be pickled, typeshed can’t match their display name, and can cause minor confusion. I’m interested in getting these to be consistent where possible.

An accounting of all the types I know about in the category is available at the linked discuss thread.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

I have already discussed this feature proposal on Discourse

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

Recent discuss thread: https://discuss.python.org/t/naming-consistency-for-various-types/70401

Another related discussion for types exposed in the types module is available here: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/100129

Linked PRs

• gh-126663
• gh-126712
• gh-126721
• gh-126723
• gh-126724
• gh-137122
• gh-137123

Start by reading the linked Discourse discussions and related issue 100129, then review PRs 126663, 126712, 126721, 126723, 126724, 137122, and 137123. Use the accounting of affected types there to determine the agreed scope; the work is done when the selected types consistently report importable names and the stated pickling and typeshed concerns are addressed.