python / python/cpython

[subinterpreters] Refleaks on Windows Under Specific Conditions

Abierto
#117,936 2 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

OS-windows pending topic-subinterpreters type-bug
Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
77.2k
Forks
35.9k
Métricas de merge de PR
Métricas de PR pendientes

Descripción

Bug report

Bug description:

One of my recent PRs, gh-117662, led to one of the Windows refleak buildbots failing^1. I'm fairly confident the PR revealed an existing source of refleaks (albeit an unlikely one), rather that introducing new leaks. I have resolved the failures with gh-117913, but the underlying potential source of refleaks remains.

I've been able to reproduce the leak conditions, but only on Windows (for now?). The following conditions are necessary:

  • interpreter created using a config with check_multi_interp_extensions=False (e.g. "legacy")
  • interpreter imports test.support.os_helper
try:
    import _interpreters
except ModuleNotFoundError:
    import _xxsubinterpreters as _interpreters
config = _interpreters.new_config('legacy')  # critically, check_multi_interp_extensions=False
interpid = _interpreters.create(config)
_interpreters.exec(interpid, 'import test.support.os_helper')
_interpreters.destroy(interpid)
# leaks a bunch of objects

When the bug is triggered, around 190 objects are leaked. At first I thought this was interpreter finalization failing silently, but now I think it is something else.

I suspect the underlying problem relates to legacy extension modules. In the specific example above, I'm pretty sure the _ctypes module is leaking and ~190 is how many objects it holds, directly or indirectly. The main clue there is that, when I run ./python -v ..., the _ctypes module is never noted as destroyed, whereas all other modules are. As to test.support.os_helper, _ctypes is one of the modules that gets indirectly imported. All that said, I haven't been able to reproduce the leak if the subinterpreter above imports _ctypes instead.

Why did we only see this on Windows? The only clue I can think of is that on Windows stdlib extension modules are all turned into builtin modules, IIRC. The logic of the check_multi_interp_extensions check (via _PyImport_CheckSubinterpIncompatibleExtensionAllowed() in Python/import.c) is specific to extension modules, not builtin modules.

CPython versions tested on:

CPython main branch

Operating systems tested on:

Windows

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Línea de trabajo

Reproduce la fuga de Windows con el fragmento _interpreters legacy-config proporcionado y empieza después en Python/import.c, alrededor de _PyImport_CheckSubinterpIncompatibleExtensionAllowed(). Compara la limpieza de módulos para test.support.os_helper y _ctypes usando la salida detallada de importación descrita en el informe. Se considera terminado cuando el reproductor ya no filtra objetos y el comportamiento relevante de Windows está cubierto por una prueba de regresión adecuada.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
python
Área
operating-systems
Tipo de issue
Error
Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Claridad
Bastante claro
Aptitud para principiantes
38/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.