microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Enum-specific interfaces enums could implement

オープン
#39,773 コメント 1 件 リアクション 2 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

Awaiting More Feedback Suggestion
主要言語
Go
スター
111k
フォーク
14.3k
平均マージ
2日 4時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
132

説明

Search Terms

  • enum interface typescript
  • enum implements typescript

Suggestion

Make interfaces work with enums.

Enum interface

An interface describing what an enum should look like.

enum interface EnumInterface {
  Ok,
  NotOk
}
Enum implements enum interface

Enum implements an enum interface by including in its values the fields described by the interface.

enum EnumName implements EnumInterface {
  Ok,
  NotOk,
  Other
}

This mechanism should also work for const enums. The same interface should be implementable by both a const enum and a regular enum.

An enum interface could require for the enum to have a specific value, although it is not necessary.

An enum interface which has strict requirements for both the names and values would throw an error where either the name is not present in the enum implementing the interface or if the name is present but the value is not the same as the one defined in the interface.

enum interface EnumInterface {
  Ok=0,
  NotOk=1
}

Use Cases

Let say I'm creating an API. Each response I encode as a const enum result. Each of the response has some of the same results, (same possible errors) for example:

Both a

  • POST /post (creating a post) request and a
  • DELETE /post (deleting a post) request

may trigger the same errors regarding lack of authentication. Here I demonstrate two const enums describing the possible results of the two endpoints.

const enum CreatePost {
  OK,
  NO_AUTHORIZATION,
  OTHER_ERROR
}

const enum DeletePost {
  OK,
  NO_AUTHORIZATION,
  AUTHORIZED_BUT_NOT_AN_OWNER
}

Now, before the API handler in a perfect world one could create a method of signature:

declare function requireAuthentication(
   request: Request,
   handler: Handler,
   makeError: (result: RESULTS) => Response
): Handler;

Which would be fine, but makeError needs to be called from inside the requireAuthentication with a known error like, NO_AUTHENTICATION. So what is needed is:

  • a status map object mapping from the kind of error that requireAuthentication middleware may trigger into the particular result of the particular endpoint (in this case either a CreatePost or DeletePost enum),
  • another parameter for the middleware requireAuthentication.
interface AuthenticationErrorMap<Result extends RESULTS> {
   NO_AUTHORIZATION: Result
}

declare function requireAuthenticationReal<Result extends RESULTS>(
   request: Request,
   handler: Handler,
   makeError: (result: Result) => Response,
   statusCodeMap: AuthenticationErrorMap<Result>
): Handler;

Now with a few endpoints this is fine, but in production one can have a large number of endpoints for which a status map object has to be constructed manually for each endpoint:

const statusMapCreatePost: AuthenticationErrorMap<CreatePost> = {
   NO_AUTHORIZATION: CreatePost.NO_AUTHORIZATION
};

Now this is a simplified example, but in real life one could have lots of endpoints and lots of possible ways for things to fail.

Examples

As for the solution, the perfect thing for this use-case would be to make an enum interface:

enum interface NeedsAuthorizationResults {
   NO_AUTHORIZATION
}

Which then could be implemented on all endpoints' result enums:

const enum CreatePost implements NeedsAuthorizationResults {
  OK,
  NO_AUTHORIZATION,
  OTHER_ERROR
}

const enum DeletePost implements NeedsAuthorizationResults {
  OK,
  NO_AUTHORIZATION,
  AUTHORIZED_BUT_NOT_AN_OWNER
}

Which would then stop us from having to create an object for each endpoint with the AuthenticationErrorMap type. Instead something like this could be written:

declare function requireAuthenticationProposal<Result extends NeedsAuthorizationResults>(
   request: Request,
   handler: Handler,
   makeError: (result: Result) => Response,
): Handler;

Playground.

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

調査の方向性

まず enum-interface の提案、その TypeScript Playground の例、およびリンクされている TypeScript design goals を確認してください。完全な実装では、通常の enum と const enum をサポートし、提案されたメンバー名と値を適用し、示されているジェネリックなユースケースを検証する必要があります。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
typescript
領域
compilers
issue の種類
機能追加
難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
活発さ
停滞
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
25/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。