microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Don't emit `const enum`s with reverse mapping (under `preserveConstEnum`)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 19 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 117
Descripción
Search Terms
preserveConstEnums, const enum, enum
Suggestion
By default all const enums are preserved from output. One of the key differences of const enums is disallowing to looking up the reversed value:
enum Enum {
Zero,
One,
}
console.log(Enum[1]); // allowed, result is 'One'
const enum ConstEnum {
Zero,
One,
}
console.log(ConstEnum[1]); // Error
This means that we can't access const enum's "reversed" member even if preserveConstEnums flag is enabled.
JS code of const enum with enabled preserveConstEnums is pretty similar to just enums right now and contains string literals (even they couldn't be accessed from the code):
var ConstEnum;
(function (ConstEnum) {
ConstEnum[ConstEnum["Zero"] = 0] = "Zero";
ConstEnum[ConstEnum["One"] = 1] = "One";
})(ConstEnum || (ConstEnum = {}));
My feature request is change output of const enums when preserveConstEnums is enabled and strip "reversed" values from it:
var ConstEnum;
(function (ConstEnum) {
ConstEnum["Zero"] = 0;
ConstEnum["One"] = 1;
})(ConstEnum || (ConstEnum = {}));
Note: actually tsc already has similar behaviour if you specify string constant value for every const enum's member, but the values are strings, not numbers - it is kind of workaround if your const enum is used to declare string constants.
Use Cases
Reversed values for const enums are useless and cannot be accessed in the TS code, so why we should emit them? 🤔 I guess in this case the behaviour of const enums from types and from execution (JS) purposes will be the same.
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
El issue no menciona archivos ni tests. Empieza localizando el punto de entrada del compilador que emite const enums cuando preserveConstEnums está habilitado, compáralo con el comportamiento existente de los const enums con valores de cadena y sigue los tests relevantes del emitter; se considera terminado cuando los const enums numéricos se emiten sin reverse mappings, mientras que los enums normales conservan su salida actual.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- compilers
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 30/100