how to monitor changes in a table when there is huge amount od data
- Langage dominant
- Java
- Étoiles
- 130
- Forks
- 21
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Aucune PR mergée en 30 j
Description
Hi,
I used Changes(Table) to init changes, and there are nearly 150,000 records in a table, I just changed one record.I used setStartPointNow() and setEndPointNow() to monitor the changes. when I tried to find what changed in the table, changes.getChangeList() went into an endless loop.
Is there a performance bottleneck about the amount of records in a table.
Testcase run as the following pic:

Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Piste de recherche
Start by reproducing the testcase shown in the issue: initialize Changes(Table) for a table with nearly 150,000 records, call setStartPointNow() and setEndPointNow(), then run changes.getChangeList(). Determine whether the call completes after changing one record and document the observed performance or endless-loop behavior as the completion criterion.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- java
- Domaine
- databases
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- À clarifier
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100