how to monitor changes in a table when there is huge amount od data
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Java
- Sterne
- 130
- Forks
- 21
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
Hi,
I used Changes(Table) to init changes, and there are nearly 150,000 records in a table, I just changed one record.I used setStartPointNow() and setEndPointNow() to monitor the changes. when I tried to find what changed in the table, changes.getChangeList() went into an endless loop.
Is there a performance bottleneck about the amount of records in a table.
Testcase run as the following pic:

Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Start by reproducing the testcase shown in the issue: initialize Changes(Table) for a table with nearly 150,000 records, call setStartPointNow() and setEndPointNow(), then run changes.getChangeList(). Determine whether the call completes after changing one record and document the observed performance or endless-loop behavior as the completion criterion.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- java
- Bereich
- databases
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100