setInterval(()=>null,0) makes any animation much smoother

Environment

• CLI: 6.1.2
• Android Runtime: 6.0.2 / 6.1.2

Describe the bug
I'm working on custom animation (screen blinking at 60fps) on Android, and I was very surprised that using of stupid setInterval(() => {...}, 0) works much better that the native android's Choreographer.

With setInterval(() => {...}, 0) I've got stable 60 FPS even on android 5 devices, but with Choreographer (that should work much efficiency, code below) I got drops to 50 FPS on powerful OnePlus 6 on Android 9.0

android.view.Choreographer.getInstance().postFrameCallback(...);

But if I write down setInterval(() => null); near the Choreographer callback definition - I will achieve stable FPS and low GPU utilisation (LOL, right?).

To Reproduce
I have created app on playground where everybody can test it. Turn on 'Profile GPU rendering' - 'On screen as bars' in 'developer options' menu and launch this simple app with simple loader on 2 pages - one with absolutely empty component, another one with setInterval(() => {}, 0) in OnInit.

Sample project
Nativescript Playground

Additional context
I've recorded animations to demonstrate this behaviour Imgur
And my question on StackOverflow (without any answer) link

Inizia riproducendo il NativeScript Playground collegato su Android con Profile GPU rendering abilitato, confrontando la schermata vuota, setInterval(..., 0) e i casi Choreographer.postFrameCallback. Poi traccia i punti di ingresso della pianificazione del runtime Android per setInterval e Choreographer; il lavoro è completato quando la differenza nella frequenza dei fotogrammi è stata spiegata o corretta e il confronto è stato verificato sui dispositivi indicati.