setInterval(()=>null,0) makes any animation much smoother

Environment

• CLI: 6.1.2
• Android Runtime: 6.0.2 / 6.1.2

Describe the bug
I'm working on custom animation (screen blinking at 60fps) on Android, and I was very surprised that using of stupid setInterval(() => {...}, 0) works much better that the native android's Choreographer.

With setInterval(() => {...}, 0) I've got stable 60 FPS even on android 5 devices, but with Choreographer (that should work much efficiency, code below) I got drops to 50 FPS on powerful OnePlus 6 on Android 9.0

android.view.Choreographer.getInstance().postFrameCallback(...);

But if I write down setInterval(() => null); near the Choreographer callback definition - I will achieve stable FPS and low GPU utilisation (LOL, right?).

To Reproduce
I have created app on playground where everybody can test it. Turn on 'Profile GPU rendering' - 'On screen as bars' in 'developer options' menu and launch this simple app with simple loader on 2 pages - one with absolutely empty component, another one with setInterval(() => {}, 0) in OnInit.

Sample project
Nativescript Playground

Additional context
I've recorded animations to demonstrate this behaviour Imgur
And my question on StackOverflow (without any answer) link

Empieza reproduciendo el NativeScript Playground enlazado en Android con Profile GPU rendering habilitado, comparando la pantalla vacía, setInterval(..., 0) y los casos de Choreographer.postFrameCallback. Después, rastrea los puntos de entrada de la planificación del runtime de Android para setInterval y Choreographer; se considera terminado cuando se haya explicado o corregido la diferencia de velocidad de fotogramas y se haya verificado la comparación en los dispositivos indicados.