CommandCodeAI / CommandCodeAI/command-code
GOAT Plan: DeepSeek V4 Flash Cache Read billed ~53% higher than published rate (off-peak usage)
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- Nessun dato sulla lingua
- Stelle
- 4k
- Fork
- 350
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Descrizione
Summary
Description
I've identified a billing discrepancy on the GOAT plan when using DeepSeek V4 Flash. The actual cost for Cache Read tokens is significantly higher than the published rate in the official pricing table, while Input and Output costs match the table exactly.
Expected Behavior
Based on the official GOAT pricing table for DeepSeek V4 Flash:
- Input: $0.22/M
- Output: $0.66/M
- Cache Read: $0.007/M
With my usage (all during off-peak hours):
-
Input: 2.5M × $0.22 = $0.55
-
Output: 0.7874M × $0.66 = $0.5197
-
Cache Read: 83.1M × $0.007 = $0.5817
-
Total expected: $1.65
Actual Behavior
Dashboard shows:
-
DeepSeek V4 Flash: $1.96
-
web_search: $0.01
-
Total actual: $1.97
That's a $0.31 difference
Steps to reproduce the issue
- Use DeepSeek V4 Flash on the GOAT plan during off-peak hours.
- Generate significant Cache Read usage (83.1M tokens over 2 days).
- Compare the actual billed amount against the official pricing table.
Supporting Information
- Official pricing table: https://commandcode.ai/docs/plans/goat
- Usage breakdown (2 days):
- Cache Read: 83.1M
- Input (uncached): 2.5M
- Output: 0.7874M
- Total tokens: 86.4M
Command Code Version
1.29.0
Environment
- Plan: GOAT
- Model: DeepSeek V4 Flash
- Usage Period: August 17–18, 2026
- Usage Window: All off-peak hours (no peak-time surcharges should apply)
- ZDR (Zero Data Retention): Not enabled
Operating System
macOS
Terminal/IDE
WezTerm
Shell
zsh
Session file (optional)
No response
Fix prompt (optional)
No response
Additional context
I contacted support and was told that the GOAT plan uses credits and each model consumes them at a different rate. However, this doesn't explain why only Cache Read deviates from the table while Input and Output match perfectly.
I've also discussed this with other users and the hourly pricing theory was suggested (peak/off-peak rates), but since all my usage was during off-peak hours, that doesn't account for the discrepancy.
Note on Trace IDs:
I cannot access the individual trace IDs for those days because the Command Code Studio UI only displays the last 100 requests. I've asked support if there's a way to retrieve the full history, but I don't have the granular per-request data to pinpoint exactly which requests caused the overage. If there's an API endpoint or log export I can use to get the full trace history, please let me know.
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia con la tabella dei prezzi di GOAT e la suddivisione dell’utilizzo nella dashboard per DeepSeek V4 Flash, quindi verifica se la cronologia completa delle tracce è disponibile tramite un’API o un’esportazione dei log. Confronta la fatturazione di Cache Read durante il periodo di bassa affluenza segnalato con la tariffa pubblicata; il lavoro è completato quando la discrepanza viene corretta oppure la sua base di fatturazione viene spiegata chiaramente.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Ambito
- ai, payments
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100