GOAT Plan: DeepSeek V4 Flash Cache Read billed ~53% higher than published rate (off-peak usage)

Aberta
#722 3 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
4/5
Tempo estimado
3-5 dias
Facilidade para iniciantes
35/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Precisa de esclarecimento
Status de atividade
Ativa
Domínio
ai, payments

Direção de pesquisa

Comece pela tabela de preços da GOAT e pelo detalhamento de uso no dashboard para DeepSeek V4 Flash; em seguida, investigue se o histórico completo de traces está disponível por meio de uma API ou de uma exportação de logs. Compare a cobrança de Cache Read durante o período fora de pico relatado com a tarifa publicada; considera-se concluído quando a discrepância é corrigida ou sua base de cobrança é claramente explicada.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

Summary
Description

I've identified a billing discrepancy on the GOAT plan when using DeepSeek V4 Flash. The actual cost for Cache Read tokens is significantly higher than the published rate in the official pricing table, while Input and Output costs match the table exactly.

Expected Behavior

Based on the official GOAT pricing table for DeepSeek V4 Flash:

  • Input: $0.22/M
  • Output: $0.66/M
  • Cache Read: $0.007/M

With my usage (all during off-peak hours):

  • Input: 2.5M × $0.22 = $0.55

  • Output: 0.7874M × $0.66 = $0.5197

  • Cache Read: 83.1M × $0.007 = $0.5817

  • Total expected: $1.65

Actual Behavior

Dashboard shows:

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash: $1.96

  • web_search: $0.01

  • Total actual: $1.97

That's a $0.31 difference

Image Image
Steps to reproduce the issue
  1. Use DeepSeek V4 Flash on the GOAT plan during off-peak hours.
  2. Generate significant Cache Read usage (83.1M tokens over 2 days).
  3. Compare the actual billed amount against the official pricing table.
Supporting Information
Command Code Version

1.29.0

Environment
  • Plan: GOAT
  • Model: DeepSeek V4 Flash
  • Usage Period: August 17–18, 2026
  • Usage Window: All off-peak hours (no peak-time surcharges should apply)
  • ZDR (Zero Data Retention): Not enabled
Operating System

macOS

Terminal/IDE

WezTerm

Shell

zsh

Session file (optional)

No response

Fix prompt (optional)

No response

Additional context

I contacted support and was told that the GOAT plan uses credits and each model consumes them at a different rate. However, this doesn't explain why only Cache Read deviates from the table while Input and Output match perfectly.

I've also discussed this with other users and the hourly pricing theory was suggested (peak/off-peak rates), but since all my usage was during off-peak hours, that doesn't account for the discrepancy.

Note on Trace IDs:

I cannot access the individual trace IDs for those days because the Command Code Studio UI only displays the last 100 requests. I've asked support if there's a way to retrieve the full history, but I don't have the granular per-request data to pinpoint exactly which requests caused the overage. If there's an API endpoint or log export I can use to get the full trace history, please let me know.

Linguagem predominante
Sem dados de linguagem
Estrelas
4k
Forks
350
Métricas de merge de PRs
Nenhum PR com merge em 30d

Guia de contribuição

Nenhum guia de contribuição indexado para este repositório

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de CommandCodeAI/command-code

Todas as issues de CommandCodeAI/command-code

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de AI Infra & Agents

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.