CommandCodeAI / CommandCodeAI/command-code

GOAT Plan: DeepSeek V4 Flash Cache Read billed ~53% higher than published rate (off-peak usage)

Open
#722 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
No language data
Stars
4k
Forks
350
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Summary
Description

I've identified a billing discrepancy on the GOAT plan when using DeepSeek V4 Flash. The actual cost for Cache Read tokens is significantly higher than the published rate in the official pricing table, while Input and Output costs match the table exactly.

Expected Behavior

Based on the official GOAT pricing table for DeepSeek V4 Flash:

  • Input: $0.22/M
  • Output: $0.66/M
  • Cache Read: $0.007/M

With my usage (all during off-peak hours):

  • Input: 2.5M × $0.22 = $0.55

  • Output: 0.7874M × $0.66 = $0.5197

  • Cache Read: 83.1M × $0.007 = $0.5817

  • Total expected: $1.65

Actual Behavior

Dashboard shows:

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash: $1.96

  • web_search: $0.01

  • Total actual: $1.97

That's a $0.31 difference

Image Image
Steps to reproduce the issue
  1. Use DeepSeek V4 Flash on the GOAT plan during off-peak hours.
  2. Generate significant Cache Read usage (83.1M tokens over 2 days).
  3. Compare the actual billed amount against the official pricing table.
Supporting Information
Command Code Version

1.29.0

Environment
  • Plan: GOAT
  • Model: DeepSeek V4 Flash
  • Usage Period: August 17–18, 2026
  • Usage Window: All off-peak hours (no peak-time surcharges should apply)
  • ZDR (Zero Data Retention): Not enabled
Operating System

macOS

Terminal/IDE

WezTerm

Shell

zsh

Session file (optional)

No response

Fix prompt (optional)

No response

Additional context

I contacted support and was told that the GOAT plan uses credits and each model consumes them at a different rate. However, this doesn't explain why only Cache Read deviates from the table while Input and Output match perfectly.

I've also discussed this with other users and the hourly pricing theory was suggested (peak/off-peak rates), but since all my usage was during off-peak hours, that doesn't account for the discrepancy.

Note on Trace IDs:

I cannot access the individual trace IDs for those days because the Command Code Studio UI only displays the last 100 requests. I've asked support if there's a way to retrieve the full history, but I don't have the granular per-request data to pinpoint exactly which requests caused the overage. If there's an API endpoint or log export I can use to get the full trace history, please let me know.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the GOAT pricing table and the dashboard usage breakdown for DeepSeek V4 Flash, then investigate whether full trace history is available through an API or log export. Compare Cache Read billing during the reported off-peak period with the published rate; done means the discrepancy is corrected or its billing basis is clearly explained.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
ai, payments
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.